2 edition of Evaluative bibliometrics found in the catalog.
|Statement||prepared by Francis Narin and the staff of Computer Horizons, Inc.|
One way t o meet these initiatives and mandates quantitatively is to use evaluative bibliometrics. Bibliometrics is a method to research the science of science, or to evaluate the productivity of scientific research. Essentially, bibliometrics uses mathematics and statistical methods to. A comprehensive, state-of-the-art examination of the changing ways we measure scholarly performance and research impact. Bibliometrics has moved well beyond the mere tracking of bibliographic citations. The web enables new ways to measure scholarly productivity and impact, making available tools and data that can reveal patterns of intellectual activity and impact that were previously.
Evaluative bibliometrics uses advanced techniques to assess the impact of scholarly work in the context of other scientific work and usually compares the relative scientific contributions of research groups or institutions. Using publications from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) HIV/AIDS extramural clinical trials networks, we assessed the presence Cited by: Bibliometrics as a Tool for Research Evaluation Chapter in forthcoming book: Al Link & Nick Vornatas, Handbook on the Theory and Practice of Program Evaluation, Edward Elgar, Diana Hicks and Julia Melkers School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA, March
Downloadable (with restrictions)! Evaluative bibliometrics is concerned with comparing research units by using statistical procedures. According to Williams () an empirical study should be concerned with the substantive and practical significance of the findings as well as the sign and statistical significance of effects. In this study we will explain what adjusted predictions and marginal. Evaluative bibliometrics compares the citation impact of researchers, research groups and institutions with each other across time scales and disciplines. Both factors - discipline and period - have an influence on the citation count which is independent of the quality of the publication.
Social problems of the seventies
Kinematic analysis of mechanisms.
An exposure of the malversations and corruptions of the executive government and of Congress
Dizionario di biologia.
Fine architectural books.
lure of the sea
Protecting our environment
Adobe as a construction material in Texas
Nominations of Thomas F. Kranz, Todd W. Dillard, and Antonio C. Amador
Primitive art from the Manchester Museum
In this book, Yves Gingras offers a spirited argument against an unquestioning reliance on bibliometrics as an indicator of research quality. Gingras shows that bibliometric rankings have no real scientific validity, rarely measuring what they pretend to. Applied Evaluative Informetrics (Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Scientific Cited by: Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity Unknown Binding – January 1, by Francis Narin (Author) See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Author: Francis Narin. Scopus was used because its citation analysis includes more articles and more citations per article than other databases. 16,17 The citation analysis used evaluative bibliometr 19 and.
An Introduction to Bibliometrics: New Development and Trends provides a comprehensible, readable and easy to read introduction to bibliometrics.
Importantly, the book surveys the latest developments of bibliometrics (such as altmetrics, etc.) and how the field is likely to change over the next decade.
Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation takes the reader through the challenges surrounding the use of quantitative indicators in research evaluation, considers the reasons behind their current misuse, and offers proposals and examples of the contributions that indicators can make to the analysis of the dynamics of science and to the evidence base for research policy.
Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity Book January with Reads How we measure 'reads'Author: Francis Narin. Research, published a seminal report to the US National Science Foundation entitled Evaluative Bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity.
The current book represents a continuation of his work. It is also an update of an earlier book published byAuthor: Henk F.
Moed. Bibliometrics for Research Management and Research Evaluation A Brief Introduction Ludo Waltman Ed Noyons March CWTS BV P.O. Box AX Leiden, The Netherlands Tel. +31 71 Fax +31 71 E-mail [email protected] This paper covers the differences between two separate bibliometric approaches, labelled ‘descriptive’ versus ‘evaluative’, or top down versus bottom up.
The most important difference between these two approaches is found in the level of validity of the underlying research by: While evaluative bibliometrics study includes the “study of the literature used by research workers in a given field”.
Such a study is often made by counting the references cited by a large number of research workers in their paper. Get this from a library. Applied evaluative informetrics. [H F Moed] -- This book presents an introduction to the field of applied evaluative informetrics, dealing with the use of bibliometric or informetric indicators in research assessment.
It sketches the field's. education as opposed to its use in research is very low and does not explicitly include evaluative bibliometrics as a library service (Corrall & Kennan et al., ; Zhao, ).
A survey by Manuela Richter () indicated that the engagement in evaluative bibliometrics in. Pub Date: May arXiv: arXiv Bibcode: arXivM Keywords: Computer Science - Digital Libraries; E-Print: The posted version is a preprint (author copy) of Part 1 (General Introduction and Synopsis) of a book entitled Applied Evaluative Bibliometrics, to be published by Springer in the summer of Author: Henk F.
Moed. EVALUATIVE BIBLIOMETRICS: THE USE OF PUBLICATION AND CITATION ANALYSIS IN THE EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY Prepared by Francis Narin and the staff of COMPUTER HORIZONS, INC.
Kings Highway North Cherry Hill, New Jersey Phone / In Fulfillment of Contract NSF C with the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION G Street, Size: 5MB. In our monograph “Evaluative Bibliometrics” we discussed the many uses of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activities, and some of the basic statistical properties of the scientific literature, particularly the skewness of the distributions of publications and citations, reference time distributions, and various anomalies in the citation patterns from.
A notable feature of convening debates on evaluative bibliometrics is they do not simply attract professional bibliometricians. One way or another, all disciplines have a stake in these matters, as do publishers, policymakers, and university by: 2. An excellent starting point for an article on "Bibliometrics" is to my view the groundbreaking work SCIENTOMETRIC INDICATORS A Country Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact by Tibor Braun (Hungary), Wolfgang Glänzel (Hungary) & András Schubert (Hungary) World Scientific ISBN: This book presents an introduction to the field of applied evaluative informetrics.
The five main topics of the book are as follows: An overview of new informetric tools, often used indicators. It continues with a brief history of bibliometrics and scientometrics, recent developments and trends in aforementioned areas, basic assumptions in Author: Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh, Elaheh Hosseini.
In my new book Applied Evaluative Informetrics (How can we use research performance indicators in an informed and responsible manner?), I defend the position that bibliometrics or informetrics itself does not evaluate, and that in any assessment process an.
The posted version is a preprint (author copy) of Part 1 (General Introduction and Synopsis) of a book entitled Applied Evaluative Bibliometrics, to be published by Springer in the summer of Subjects: Digital Libraries () Cite as: arXiv  (or arXivv1  for this version)Author: Henk F.
Moed. Why bibliometrics is useful for understanding the global dynamics of science but generate perverse effects when applied inappropriately in research evaluation and university rankings.
The research evaluation market is booming. "Ranking," "metrics," "h-index,". An Introduction to Bibliometrics An Introduction to Bibliometrics: New Development and Trends provides a comprehensible, readable and easy to read introduction to bibliometrics.
Importantly, the book surveys the latest developments of bibliometrics (such as altmetrics, etc.) and how the field is likely to change over the next : Nedelina Tchangalova.
1. Introduction. Since the s much of the promise of evaluative bibliometrics has been premised on the notion of tempering the subjective and cognitive biases of peer review, so much so that it has often been imagined as an alternative mode of practice however, bibliometrics tends to supplement expert decision-making rather than supplant it (van Raan ; Moed ).Cited by: